Re: CVS update: /udk/ure/prj/build.lst

Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
> I think we already discussed that, didn't we?

IIRC, you off line promised to "think about it
again."  However, the 
apparent results of that thinking still leave me uneasy. 


In my understanding, there is a simple rule whether or not
module X 
should be listed in the dependencies of module Y:  If it is
necessary 
for the build of module Y to succeed that module X has
already been 
built and delivered, then the dependency should be listed
(modulo 
questions of transience already discussed elsewhere). 
Otherwise, no 
dependency should be listed.

The dependency you introduced does not match that rule.

-Stephan

[...]

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribeudk.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helpudk.openoffice.org