ubuntu-devel Digest, Vol 18, Issue 115

> The upstream maintainer has decided configuring
screensavers is
> something not to be implemented.

This is what essentially started this thread. There has been
a nearly  
unanimous reaction against that decision, with plenty of
problems end  
users will see as a result of this switch.

I argue that these are reasons NOT to include
gnome-screensaver in  
Dapper Drake (if at all).

  - Joshua Ochs

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devellists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:24:54 -0600
Diamond Software <diamondswmac.com> wrote:

> > The upstream maintainer has decided configuring
screensavers is
> > something not to be implemented.
> 
> This is what essentially started this thread. There has
been a nearly  
> unanimous reaction against that decision, with plenty
of problems end  
> users will see as a result of this switch.
> 
> I argue that these are reasons NOT to include
gnome-screensaver in  
> Dapper Drake (if at all).

Hear!Hear!
+1 from me.

Peter

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devellists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel