>
> Joel wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2007 9:05 PM, Wulfy <wulfmann tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Joel Bryan Juliano wrote:
> > > Well as for removing Mono, I think it's
definitely not an option to
> > > be put on the table, because dependent
applications with it are
> > > essentials that provides many capabilities
and functionalities, that
> > > are simple and easy to use. Removing it
would seems to be a very
> > > "abnormal" decision.
> > >
> >
> > What applications are dependent on Mono? I don't
see anything in the
> > reverse depends apart from coco and mono-dev...
> >
> >
>
> The 'mono' package is not installed by default, just
the 'libmono*'.
> There are 2 applications that are dependent on those
libraries, Tomboy
> and F-Spot.
> Tomboy Notes is included in Gnome as default. I think
F-Spot's
> inclusion is Ubuntu's decision.
> Other than F-Spot and Tomboy, there are also Banshee,
and Beagle that
> are dependent on libmono.
>
> Cheers
Ah. It's a GNOME thing... I run Kubuntu and I don't think
anything in
KDE depends on it.
--
Blessings
Wulfmann
Wulf Credo:
Respect the elders. Teach the young. Co-operate with the
pack.
Play when you can. Hunt when you must. Rest in between.
Share your affections. Voice your opinion. Leave your Mark.
--
sounder mailing list
sounder lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: htt
ps://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/sounder
|