|
List Info Thread: Re: FreeNX namechange
[1-2]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics ) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Re: FreeNX namechange |
|
List Info Thread: Re: FreeNX namechange
[1-2]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics ) |
||||||||||||||||||||
gmx.net ---------
> Dato: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:22:53 +0200
> >
> > Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> >> I do, in fact, remember Lindows. Why do you
think that is? 
> >> Litrix wouldn't be as informative as Lintrix,
imho.
> >
> > Lintrix doesn't sound very similar to Citr*x. But
Litrix does.
> >
>
>
> Why do we have to choose a name that draws attention
from other
> "brands", why not choose something that
stands on it's on feet?
>
You were misunderstanding me: I did not advocate Litrix -- I
rather
warned against using it. The one who proposed it was
advocating
Lintrix, saying it described what $new_FreeNX_name does,
also
implying it would have an appeal through the similar sound
of that
familiar brand. I argued that Lintrix didn't sound very
similar, but
Litrix does. However, *IF* you used Litrix, its fate would
become
more similar to fate of the Lindows name....
> I like the concept behind VLSC, but the problem (as
already
> described) for me is that it isn't very easy to
pronounce.
> (I like the logo/artwork too :P) ScreenCable is maybe
better,
> but still I hope for ... something "better".
> HYDE too could work for me (Kurt - I didn't understand
the
> arguments pro/con, could you elaborate please?),
>
I don't know which post of mine you are referring to....
--
Kurt Pfeifle
System & Network Printing Consultant ----
Linux/Unix/Windows/Samba/CUPS
Infotec Deutschland GmbH ..................... Hedelfinger
Strasse 58
A RICOH Company ........................... D-70327
Stuttgart/Germany
____________________________________________________________
____
Were you helped on this list with your FreeNX problem?
Then please write up the solution in the FreeNX
Wiki/FAQ:
>> I like the concept behind VLSC, but the problem (as
already
>> described) for me is that it isn't very easy to
pronounce.
>> (I like the logo/artwork too :P) ScreenCable is
maybe better,
>> but still I hope for ... something
"better".
>> HYDE too could work for me (Kurt - I didn't
understand the
>> arguments pro/con, could you elaborate please?),
>>
>>
>
> I don't know which post of mine you are referring
to....
>
>
It's ok, I've re-read the post (1. post on 21. July), and I
interpret
your post as beeing positive to the name 'HYDE', as I am.