List Info

Thread: Re: s:rubypath in ftplugin/ruby.vim




Re: s:rubypath in ftplugin/ruby.vim
user name
2007-01-23 13:43:55
Tim Pope wrote: > A little further investigation reveals the trigger. The first time > the Ruby interface is used is significant. If it is used at the top > level, all is well. If it is nested deep inside several function > calls, this seems to reduce the available stack space to Ruby. Note > that only there very first call is relevant. If I add > > silent! ruby nil > > to the plugin initialization function of rails.vim (so that the call > is nested just one function deep), everything works great. I'm not > thrilled with forcing initialization at each start but I can't find a > better place to do it. > I wonder if the same thing happens with the other interfaces. > This does not help my segfaulting acquaintance (whom I wlll hereafter > refer to as jsunn) though. I still think use of the interface in the > ftplugin should be limited to Windows. > I'm fine with that, it doesn't really bother me anywhere other than windows. Though wouldn't that handle the initialization issue for you? Thanks Tim --mark _______________________________________________ vim-ruby-devel mailing list vim-ruby-develrubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/vim-ruby-devel
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )