Hello Miguel and Rafael,
I like this idea 
>From my point of view, it sounds great to me since it
gives the opportunity to benefit from the gmcs work. And
there has been and will be lot of work as I can see.
(But I'm not a guy who is able to make recommendations in
the compiler area, this level is too high for me. Here, the
compiler gurus (e.g.: you!  have to
tell a word.)
Well, so far for my comments here.
-Jochen
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: mono-vb-bounces lists.ximian.com
[mailto:mono-vb-bounceslists.ximian.com] Im Auftrag von Miguel de
Icaza
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. April 2006 15:52
An: mono-vblists.ximian.com
Betreff: [mono-vb] Future of Mono's VB.NET
Hey,
Yesterday I met with Rafael and we discussed a bit what
we wanted to
do with Mono's VB compiler.
The situation is that today's VB compiler is based on a
fork of mcs circa 2002. And although some of the
improvements to mcs made it into mbas, they were not all
incorporated.
To make things worse, the new VB.NET supports generics.
So we are
wondering whether it would not be a better idea to start a
fresh fork from gmcs (along the same proposal that
Jambunathan had a year or so
ago) and implement VB that way. Lets call this effort
"mbas2".
The idea would be to go in chunks: we could integrate
individual commits that were done to the old mbas tree, and
determine one by one whether it applies to mbas2.
Maybe not all of the code can be salvaged, but if we can
get even 40% of the old code migrated into the new tree it
would be a big plus.
Now, this might be insane, because once I was talking to
someone on the VB.NET team and when I told them how mbas was
written he said "I did
not think that VB.NET could be implemented that way".
Maybe our
approach is completely busted, but I do not know enough
about VB.NET to know. I just know that if the original mbas
idea made sense, we should probably start from scratch.
Now, since we are already too close to 1.2, we should
probably develop this on a separate tree, to avoid breaking
the build of "mono/mcs", so it should be another
top level module in the Mono repository. And we should
probably also kill "mcs/bmcs" (at least we could
retrieve the few patches that were done there).
Miguel.
_______________________________________________
Mono-vb mailing list
Mono-vblists.ximian.com
http
://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-vb
_______________________________________________
Mono-vb mailing list
Mono-vblists.ximian.com
http
://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-vb
|