Editorial: no link to pseudo elements

In section 2.8, maybe you could include a "see Matching

Pseudo-Elements"  after the text "The valid
pseudo-elements are "value", 
"choices", "label",
"repeat-item", and "icon".

So it would read:
The valid pseudo-elements are "value",
"choices", "label", 
"repeat-item", and "icon" (see Matching
Pseudo-Elements).

The first time I read this, I was unsure as to where these 
pseudo-elements were being defined in the spec (or if they
where defined 
in some other CSS spec? or both).

On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> 
> In section 2.8, maybe you could include a "see
Matching Pseudo-Elements" 
> after the text "The valid pseudo-elements are
"value", "choices", 
> "label", "repeat-item", and
"icon".
> 
> So it would read:
> The valid pseudo-elements are "value",
"choices", "label",
"repeat-item", and
> "icon" (see Matching Pseudo-Elements).

Moved the "see" from the previous paragraph to
that paragraph. Let me know 
if that's ok. I don't really want to have it in both, that
looks silly.


> The first time I read this, I was unsure as to where
these 
> pseudo-elements were being defined in the spec (or if
they where defined 
> in some other CSS spec? or both).

Added a sentence to clarify this a little.

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E               
)._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/      
U+263A                /,   _..    _  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.  
`._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Excellent, thanks! 
Marcos 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ianhixie.ch] 
Sent: Friday, 5 January 2007 3:02 PM
To: Marcos Caceres
Cc: public-appformatsw3.org
Subject: Re: [XBL] Editorial: no link to pseudo elements

On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> 
> In section 2.8, maybe you could include a "see
Matching Pseudo-Elements" 
> after the text "The valid pseudo-elements are
"value", "choices", 
> "label", "repeat-item", and
"icon".
> 
> So it would read:
> The valid pseudo-elements are "value",
"choices", "label",
"repeat-item",
and
> "icon" (see Matching Pseudo-Elements).

Moved the "see" from the previous paragraph to
that paragraph. Let me know 
if that's ok. I don't really want to have it in both, that
looks silly.


> The first time I read this, I was unsure as to where
these 
> pseudo-elements were being defined in the spec (or if
they where defined 
> in some other CSS spec? or both).

Added a sentence to clarify this a little.

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E               
)._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/      
U+263A                /,   _..    _  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.  
`._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'