Currently we are just using reverse domain IDs, e.g.
com.yahoo.widget.stockticker. Do we think GUIDs are really
necessary?
We've talked about moving to them here, but I'm not sure
what it
ultimately gets us.
Eli Golovinsky wrote:
>
> I have a suggestion for the name of the id element
mentioned in
> section 3.12.
>
>
> You could call it a guidget - a global unique
identifier for a widget.
> This name also implies a possible implementation - each
widget can be
> given a random 128 (or 256) bit identifier. It works
for COM objects.
> Will probably work here as well.
>
>
> Eli Golovinsky,
>
> www.gooli.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|