Re: ISSUE-4: AC: does the spec need to differentiate a resource from a _representation_ of a resourc

On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:56:11 +0200, Web Application Formats
Issue Tracker  
<dean+cgiw3.org> wrote:
> ISSUE-4: AC: does the spec need to differentiate a
resource from a  
> _representation_ of a resource?
>
> http:/
/www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues/4
>
> Raised by:  Everyone
> On product: Access Control
>
> See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Jun
/0145.html

I have some idea of what they might mean by this, but it
seems like it  
doesn't matter much. Having said that, if someone has a good
reason to do  
this and is willing to suggest new text and monitor the
draft to make sure  
we don't do it again I'll make the necessary edits.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren
.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Rhys - regarding your 29 June comments about the WAF WG's
Enabling  
Read Access for Web Resources document, Anne invites your
input.  
Please note the latest Editor's Draft of this spec is
available at:

   <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/waf/access-control/>

Regards, AB

On Sep 20, 2007, at 9:26 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:56:11 +0200, Web Application
Formats Issue  
> Tracker <dean+cgiw3.org> wrote:
>> ISSUE-4: AC: does the spec need to differentiate a
resource from a  
>> _representation_ of a resource?
>>
>> http:/
/www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues/4
>>
>> Raised by:  Everyone
>> On product: Access Control
>>
>> See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Jun
/0145.html
>
> I have some idea of what they might mean by this, but
it seems like  
> it doesn't matter much. Having said that, if someone
has a good  
> reason to do this and is willing to suggest new text
and monitor  
> the draft to make sure we don't do it again I'll make
the necessary  
> edits.
>
>
> -- 
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren
.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>
>