List Info

Thread: New PCI requires code review or WAF




New PCI requires code review or WAF
user name
2006-09-08 15:24:50
I would guess that since they have done a list of approved
scanning vendors:

https://sdp.mastercardintl.com/vendors/vendor_list.shtml


they will do another list of vendors that specialize in web
applications?

Jeff Robertson wrote:
> Before actually reading the PDF, I immediately want to
ask:
>  
> 1. What are the criteria for an "organization
that specializes in
> application security"?
> 2. What is considered an application layer firewall?
>  
> Maybe these questions are answered in the document.
> 
>    
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>     *From Jeff
Williams [mailto:jeff.williamsowasp.org]
>     *Sent Thursday,
September 07, 2006 10:22
>     *To
webappsecsecurityfocus.com; webappseclists.owasp.org;
>     websecuritywebappsec.org
>     *Subject [WEB
SECURITY] New PCI requires code review or WAF
> 
>     Under the new requirements, applications processing
cardholder
>     information MUST get either a code review or a web
app firewall. 
>     The language isn’t exactly clear about what happens
in 2008.
> 
>      
> 
>     >From the document --
> 
>     https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/pdfs/pci_dss_v1-1
.pdf
> 
>      
> 
>     6.5 Develop all web applications based on secure
coding guidelines
>     such as the Open Web Application Security Project
guidelines. Review
>     custom application code to identify coding
vulnerabilities. Cover
>     prevention of common coding vulnerabilities in
software development
>     processes, to include the following:
> 
>     6.5.1 Unvalidated input
> 
>     6.5.2 Broken access control (for example, malicious
use of user IDs)
> 
>     6.5.3 Broken authentication and session management
(use of account
>     credentials and session cookies)
> 
>     6.5.4 Cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
> 
>     6.5.5 Buffer overflows
> 
>     6.5.6 Injection flaws (for example, structured
query language (SQL)
>     injection)
> 
>     6.5.7 Improper error handling
> 
>     6.5.8 Insecure storage
> 
>     6.5.9 Denial of service
> 
>     6.5.10 Insecure configuration management
> 
>      
> 
>     6.6 Ensure that all web-facing applications are
protected against
>     known attacks by applying either of the following
methods:
> 
>     . Having all custom application code reviewed for
common
>     vulnerabilities by an organization that specializes
in application
>     security . Installing an application layer firewall
in front of
>     web-facing applications.
> 
>      
> 
>     Note: This method is considered a best practice
until June 30, 2008,
>     after which it becomes a requirement.
> 
>      
> 
>     --Jeff
> 
>      
> 
>     Jeff Williams, Chair
> 
>     The OWASP Foundation <http://www.owasp.org/>
> 
>      
> 

-- 
Nick Owen
WiKID Systems, Inc.
404.962.8983
http://www.wikidsystems.c
om
Commercial/Open Source Two-Factor Authentication
https://www.link
edin.com/in/nickowen

------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Sponsored by: Watchfire

As web applications become increasingly complex, tremendous
amounts of 
sensitive data - personal, medical and financial - are
exchanged, and 
stored. Consumers expect and demand security for this
information. This 
whitepaper examines a few vulnerability detection methods -
specifically 
comparing and contrasting manual penetration testing with
automated 
scanning tools. Download "Automated Scanning or Manual
Penetration 
Testing?" today!

https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whi
tepapers.aspx?id=701500000008Vmm
------------------------------------------------------------
--------------

[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )