FW: Response to your counter-proposal in response to our prior action on WS-Addressing lc141

Forwarded for the record

-----Original Message-----
From: Cindy McNally [mailto:cindymcnally_6hotmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:35 AM
To: Bob Freund
Subject: RE: Response to your counter-proposal in response
to our prior
action on WS-Addressing lc141

Yes.  That was an oversight on my part.  Thanks.


>From: "Bob Freund" <bobfreunds.com>
>To: "Cindy McNally" <cindymcnally_6hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: Response to your counter-proposal in
response to our prior

>action on  WS-Addressing lc141
>Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:18:23 -0400
>
>Cindy,
>Our editor has changed your proposed default WSDL 2.0
Action pattern
for
>faults slightly, by dropping the delimiter between the
operation name
>and the direction token - this matches the pattern for
non-faults.
>
>Your proposal:
>
>[tns] [delimiter] [interface name] [delimiter]
[operation name]
>[delimiter] [direction] [delimiter] [fault name]
>
>Editor's version version:
>
>[tns] [delimiter] [interface name] [delimiter]
[operation name]
>[direction] [delimiter] [fault name]
>
>I trust that this is ok.
>Thanks
>-bob
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-addressing-comments-requestw3.org
[mailto:public-ws-
> > addressing-comments-requestw3.org] On Behalf Of Cindy
McNally
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 12:22 AM
> > To: Bob Freund
> > Cc: public-ws-addressing-commentsw3.org
> > Subject: RE: Response to your counter-proposal in
response to our
>prior
> > action on WS-Addressing lc141
> >
> >
> > Bob,
> >
> > Yes, as long as the WSDL working group does not
substantially change
>my
> > proposal, I am satisfied.  Thank you.  My
compliments to you and the
>WG
> > for
> > your efforts.
> >
> >
> > >From: "Bob Freund" <bobfreunds.com>
> > >To: "Cindy McNally"
<cindymcnally_6hotmail.com>
> > >CC: <public-ws-addressing-commentsw3.org>
> > >Subject: Response to your counter-proposal in
response to our prior
> > action
> > >on WS-Addressing lc141
> > >Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:42:12 -0400
> > >
> > >Cindy,
> > >
> > >We are delighted to report that the WG has
reconsidered its
decision
> > to
> > >close your issue with no action and, due to
your explanation and
> > >proposal offered in[1], have agreed to adopt
your text as proposed.
> > Our
> > >decision is recorded in our issues list and
minutes[2]
> > >We do intend to also check this conclusion
with the WSDL working
>group
> > >to gain their concurrence.
> > >We hope that you find this resolution
satisfactory.  Please respond
> > >accordingly to this message.
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >-bob
> > >
> > >Bob Freund
> > >Chair, W3C WS-Addressing WG
> > >
> > >[1]
> > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressin
g-
> > comments/2007Ju
> > >n/att-0006/response.html
> > >[2]
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/7/06/18-ws-addre
ssing-minutes.html
> >
> >
____________________________________________________________
_____
> > Hotmail to go? Get your Hotmail, news, sports and
much more!
> > http://mobile.msn.com
>

____________________________________________________________
_____
Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps.

http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss=Res
taurants~Hotels~Amusement%20Park
&cp=33.832922~-117.915659&style=r&lvl=13&til
t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=
1118863&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01