Ian Paterson wrote:
> Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
>> Now, the other interesting question would be :
>> What happens for retransmit requests after session
has been terminated.
>> We hold it around for 'some time' before kicking
them off (not really
>> dependent on wait/inactivity time).
>
> That's really nice of you.
>
> I agree it's an interesting question. I'm not yet sure
we should force
> all connection managers to be as kind as yours -
especially since
> providing a successful reply to a retransmit request
under any
> circumstances is only a SHOULD, not a MUST.
>
> Does anyone strongly believe that CMs SHOULD respond
even after the
> client has terminated the session? If not (only MAY
respond) then IMHO
> we could even leave this behaviour unspecified. [But
that might be
> because I'm more lazy in the small hours of the
night.]
I think MAY is appropriate here. IMHO if the client has
requests
outstanding and it really cares about what happens with
those, it
shouldn't send a terminate.
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation
http://w
ww.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml
|