--- In bowelcleanse%40yahoogroups.com">bowelcleanse
yahoogroups.com, Simon Jester <tanstaafl...>
wrote:
>
> > Someone fairly recently attacked another poster asking about the
>
> Oh, and by the way...
>
> I take exception to your characterization of my comment
Of course you would. If you're going to be insulting, you should at
least defend your insults. Why bother with compassion?
(since I'm the
> only one that this could possibly be aimed at). I attacked no one.
Of course you didn't. The original poster should be shamed for
asking what she felt was a legitimate question. Saying things
like "you haven't learned how to google" and "What's the problem?"
are killer!
So is telling everyone that a certain product you particularly have
the hots for will work for EVERYBODY. You are such the salesman, in
this forum where nobody has allergies to consider and people haven't
spent thousands of dollars on other remedies that did little to
nothing for them. I'd say you suck, but since you see things
opposite of me, YOU ROCK!
> Why is it that some people take legitimate constructive criticism
as a
> personal attack?
Why is it that some people don't recognize "constructive criticism"
is destructive if it's unsolicited?
> Why is it that some people expect other people to do their work
for them
> (researching xyz on the internet)?
Why is it that some people elect themselves as martyr and then bully
other people for asking a question about something they could not
find the answer to? And why is it that when some people don't have
anything of value to contribute to a discussion, they blame other
people for disturbing their own fragile sense of order?
> Why is it that some (most?) people say they want liberty, then
turn
> around and vote for politicians that enact legislation the only
result
> of which is to enslave them?
Dude, this is WAY beyond the scope of this forum.
Jolie
.
