List Info

Thread: Re: cmucl-19e + gcc43 better, almost there




Re: cmucl-19e + gcc43 better, almost there
user name
2008-03-14 14:18:05
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Anyone else trying cmucl-19e on a gcc43-based system? 
Any tips, tricks?

Hey, your mail finally made it! 

> on recent kernel-headers.  In short, translating -I- to
use -iquote 
> instead (and have the build respect our rpm optflags)

Can you describe why you want or need those other optflags? 
(I'm not 
familiar with them.)

Ray


Re: cmucl-19e + gcc43 better, almost there
user name
2008-03-14 14:50:41
Raymond Toy (RT/EUS) wrote:

>> on recent kernel-headers.  In short, translating
-I- to use -iquote 
>> instead (and have the build respect our rpm
optflags)
> 
> Can you describe why you want or need those other
optflags?  (I'm not 
> familiar with them.)

The latter part about using rpm optflags almost certainly is
not of
interest for upstream inclusion.  The switch away from -I-
*is*.

Using rpm optflags is mostly for distro consistency, and for
us/fedora
anyway, ensures a higher level of distro-wide security,
including:
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 and -fstack-protector

-- Rex



[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )