List Info

Thread: Re: cmucl-19e + gcc43 better, not quite there




Re: cmucl-19e + gcc43 better, not quite there
user name
2008-03-19 13:05:59
Rex Dieter wrote:

> Carl Shapiro wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Rex Dieter
<rdietermath.unl.edu> wrote:
>>>  Unlikely, I'm using clean/minimal chroot for
each build.    The failure
>>>  is occurring trying to build for fedira9
(development) that uses gcc43.
>>>   Fwiw, this same build works fine on fedora8
(using gcc41).
>> 
>> Is there an easy way I can reproduce your build
environment locally?
> 
> I would be tempted to say "on any gcc43-derived
linux system", but I'm
> not convinced that gcc43 is the (sole, if at all)
culprit.
> 
> In the meantime, I'll see about whipping up a hosted
fedora-9-i386 VM,
> to help debugging. (I personally only have a single
f9/x86_64 box atm).
>   I will give access to any cmucl dev's wiling to help
out here.

OK, got the VM up and running, offer for remote login/shell
still stands. 
Any takers?  (contact me here, or privately, either ok with
me).

-- Rex



[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )