oops. The end of the paragraph was that it says that
Occidental gave
Gore campain contributions and that Clinton administration
policies
may have helped Occidental to drill in Columbia. All
interesting if
true and let's assume for a moment it is; it still doesn't
really
connect any dots does it?
On 2/28/07, Dana <dana.tierney gmail.com> wrote:
> I am correct am I? About what? This link seems to have
been posted in
> an attempt to show that Gore is a bad person, but I
don't see anything
> here about waiving enforcement. It says that Gore's dad
owned stock in
> Occidental, that
>
> On 2/28/07, Sam <sammycode gmail.com> wrote:
> > You are correct
> > ht
tp://www.thenation.com/doc/20000522/silverstein/
> >
> >
> > On 2/28/07, Dana <dana.tierney gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > My answer however is that I don't know. If he
is though, he is a
> > > hypocrite in a relatively small way,
especially when compared to
> > > people who claim to represent the people of
the United States of
> > > America yet sign legal documents essentially
giving an oil company
> > > half a billion dollars. I guess record
profits aren't enough any more.
> >
> >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http:
//www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups
/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:229139
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/s
ubscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/un
subscribe.cfm?user=22184.15789.5
|