|
List Info
Thread: Video Editing Hardware + Software
|
|
| Video Editing Hardware + Software |
|
2006-05-15 21:42:27 |
|
Well, my "test" DVD from a VHS tape of a program that I taped about 3 Weeks ago (1 hour long, edited down to 5 segments) looks about as Top-Notch as i'd expect from a VHS Tape. ; BUT, it's LIGHT YEARS ahead of the Dazzle P.O.C. The 720x480(?) resolution is BEAUTIFUL and the sound is good too.
I did have the Pinnacle Studio installed with the Dazzle...but UNinstalled it yesterday before I took the Dazzle back.
Again, what I have now is something called MyDVD and it worked like gangbusters for a first-time VHS-to-DVD "dumping".
Again, if there's something better out there...i'm open for it. I would like a little more freedom to be able to create different graphics & drag-n-drop stuff with the Menu Screen...but i'm happy (so far) with my purchase.
>>Ray<<
"Eric C. Vogel" <ECVogel Flash.Net> wrote: Just do not install Pinnicale Studio. I hear on clean installs it works. I was hoping Avid would have taken care of the shotty programmers. Maybe v11. Friend has it and I have seen same comments online and in reviews. Thing is he makes independent movies and that is the closest to to top without paying a grand and too hard to use. ----- Original Message ----- Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 8:56 AM Subject: [CTS] Re: Video Editing Hardware + Software
I'm not sure...(this is why I ask things) 
But...so far, the reviews that i've seen and the quality of the video that I did see, were EXCELLENT.
I'm just wondering if there's a better software package that might fit better...
Ross Nelson <randomdata.net">rossrandomdata.net> wrote: Does anybody know how that's actually
calculated? For most software,
it seems completely arbitrary--more a took to get people to upgrade
their systems to get the latest and greatest software that would run
on the existing hardware.
For instance, MS Office doesn't need much, it'll run as well as any
other software on a slow system; it won't run at desirable levels,
but it'll work.
Video editing software won't quite run on a 400mhz (crawl, maybe) but
I'm guessing that 1.0 vs 1.4 won't make a difference at all. Of
course, don't go buying it based on my guess--I have been wrong once
or twice (but not three!).
On May 15, 2006, at 6:35 AM, Ray Roney wrote:
> So...my question is this: With my 1.0GHz system, 512MB of Ram and
> 40+80GB of HD space...i think i've got enough to at least start
> with until I can afford to upgrade the computer...but I want to
> make sure that the
software is gonna be decent. I went with this
> because it supports that 800-1200Mhz range of PC...at least on the
> box it does. There was another one that was recommended to me at
> the store, but the requirements were MINIMUM 1.4GHz...and since i'm
> missing that ".4" GHz...this seemed the better route to go than the
> expense of MB, CPU, and new RAM.
** YOUR HELP IS URGENTLY NEEDED **
DONATE to Hurricane Katrina victims: http://www.redcross.org/
DONATE Housing (Spare room, shelter) http://www.hurricanehousing.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Talk Shop http://www.computertalkshop.com
Un-subscribe/Vacation, http://www.computertalkshop.com/list_options.htm
List HowTo: http://www.computertalkshop.com/faq.htm
To join Computer Talk Shop's off topic list, please
goto:
http://computertalkshop.com/other_cts_lists.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You Can See How Spoiled A Society Is...By What It Throws Away." -- Lynn Johnston
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger�s low PC-to-Phone call rates.
"You Can See How Spoiled A Society Is...By What It Throws Away." -- Lynn Johnston
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. |
[1]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|