Re: Glass carrier options?

I have both and highly recommend the rotating carrier--though not for the obvious (it rotates) reason

The rotating carrier comes with a set of masks for all different kinds of film. The other is, I think, really for 120 strip film. I've found it difficult to use and had inconsistent results

I will say you are absolutely right to get a glass carrier. I see posts of people complaining they're not getting edge to edge sharpness. Well------your negative isn't flat---duhhhhh

parasko67 < parasko%40hotmail.com">paraskohotmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Awaiting my new purchase of a Nikon 9000 to be delivered. I have not
purchased a glass carrier as yet. What options do I have in this
regard?

Is the Nikon carrier the way to go (not the rotating version) or are
there better 3rd party options?

Any advice appreciated.

Thanks.

Barry

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Messages in this topic (0) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.

So does everyone agree that the rotating holder is better than the
869G Strip Film Holder for panoramics (Xpan shots)?

--- In coolscan8000-9000%40yahoogroups.com">coolscan8000-9000yahoogroups.com, Andrew Berg
<anberg12000...> wrote:
&gt;
> I have both and highly recommend the rotating carrier--though not
for the obvious (it rotates) reason
&gt;
> The rotating carrier comes with a set of masks for all different
kinds of film. The other is, I think, really for 120 strip film.
I've found it difficult to use and had inconsistent results
>
> I will say you are absolutely right to get a glass carrier. I
see posts of people complaining they're not getting edge to edge
sharpness. Well------your negative isn't flat---duhhhhh
>
> parasko67 <parasko...> wrote:
&gt; Hi all,
>; Awaiting my new purchase of a Nikon 9000 to be delivered. I have
not
> purchased a glass carrier as yet. What options do I have in this
> regard?
>
> Is the Nikon carrier the way to go (not the rotating version) or
are
> there better 3rd party options?
>
> Any advice appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Barry
&gt;
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Messages in this topic (0) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.