[sorry for jumping in so late, didn't read git vger for
a while]
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On 7/15/07, Eric S. Raymond <esr thyrsus.com> wrote:
>> Not quite. I'm suggesting it's an appropriate
lingua franca for
>> centralized
>> VCSes with branching, e.g. everything pre-Arch.
I do not think Eric is right here. You will allways lose
information when converting CVS to svn, and if it is just
the uncertainty, the non-atomicity. This is also
information (hidden one, though).
> That's a huge goal that gets in the way of waht we want
to do here: we
> are trying to save time, not embark on some huge
mission.
>
> cvs2svn has all the
"wtf-did-cvs-mean-by-that" algorithms that are
> very hard to write and maintain, and it seems to be the
best one at
> that. Of course, it also writes SVN repos -- but I'm
sure that's the
> easiest part.
True. However, cvs2svn has many assumptions (or at least
has had when I last checked) which are targeted to svn, and
unsuitable for a generic system (tags + branches).
> We don't need no meta VCS for any of this.
Yes. I've already done what people want, it is not called
cvs2xxx, but fromcvs [1]. I don't think it is necessary to
define an output format. Of course, that's possible, but
limiting yourself to a file format means you're losing
flexibility, which is needed for efficient, correct and fast
repository conversion.
cheers
simon
[1] http://
ww2.fs.ei.tum.de/~corecode/hg/fromcvs/
--
Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII
Ribbon /"
Work - Mac +++ space for low €€€ NOW!1 +++
Campaign /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org
Against HTML
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz
Mail + News /
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe cvs2svn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help cvs2svn.tigris.org
|