Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> I do not think Eric is right here. You will allways
lose information
> when converting CVS to svn, and if it is just the
uncertainty, the
> non-atomicity. This is also information (hidden one,
though).
Full ACK.
> Yes. I've already done what people want, it is not
called cvs2xxx, but
> fromcvs [1]. I don't think it is necessary to define
an output format.
> Of course, that's possible, but limiting yourself to a
file format means
> you're losing flexibility, which is needed for
efficient, correct and
> fast repository conversion.
Hm.. interesting. I'll have a close look.
Regards
Markus
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe cvs2svn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helpcvs2svn.tigris.org
|