I would second that opinion. I believe one library file is
most
efficient.
David W. Carr
Ecologist
URS Corporation
2020 E First Street, Suite 400
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Tel: 714.835.6886
Direct: 714.648.2760
Mobile: 714.679.2933
Fax: 714.433.7701
david_carr urscorp.com
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you
receive this
message in error or are not the intended recipient, you
should not
retain, distribute, disclose or use any of this information
and you
should destroy the e-mail and any attachments or copies.
robert.wolfe queensu.ca[robert.wolfe queensu.ca]
robert.wolfe queensu.ca[robert.wolfe queensu.ca]
Sent by: listmaster isiresearchsoft.com
12/19/2007 11:56 AM Please respond to
endnote-interest isiresearchsoft.com
To
Endnote-Interest edcksrhat.isinet.com
cc
Subject
Re: Opinions about organizing sources
for what it's worth, I keep all my references in all my
projects in one
library. Why would I want more than one? Why would I want to
risk
overlooking a source that might be relevant for a new
project? After
more than 15 years, it's close to 17,000 entries, which
EndNote searches
almost instantly. If I think I want to associate a
particular reference
with one project, it's easy to use an entry in Keywords or
another field
for the purpose
|