Re: Opinions about organizing sources

Agreed. If you want to create distinct sub-libraries, either
create new
keywords for each, or better yet use one of the unused
fields as a
holder for a suitable descriptor, independent of the
keywords field. The
'groups' feature would be useful when working on a
particular project
(like a paper/report).

Cheers,
Joe

--
Dr Joseph Voros
Senior Lecturer - Strategy
Faculty of Business & Enterprise
Swinburne University of Technology
John Street, Hawthorn VIC 3122, Australia
T: +61.3.9214-5984 (GMT+10) F: +61.3.9214-5336
E: jvorosswin.edu.au  W: www.swinburne.edu.au/business/
Internal Mail:
H25; AGSE Building: Google Earth: 37 49'17"S, 145
02'22"E Omnia dicta
fortiora si dicta Latina.
 
Puzzled about Change of Preference?
Come along to an information afternoon  - Wednesday 19
December, 3.00pm
- 7.00pm www.swinburne.edu.au/cop 
 


>>> <David_CarrURSCorp.com[David_CarrURSCorp.com]> 21/12/07 05:55 >>>
I would second that opinion. I believe one library file is
most
efficient.

David W. Carr
Ecologist


robert.wolfequeensu.ca[robert.wolfequeensu.ca] 


robert.wolfequeensu.ca[robert.wolfequeensu.ca]
Sent by: listmasterisiresearchsoft.com
12/19/2007 11:56 AM Please respond to
endnote-interestisiresearchsoft.com 

 

To 
Endnote-Interestedcksrhat.isinet.com 


cc 
 


Subject 
Re: Opinions about organizing sources 
  
 

for what it's worth, I keep all my references in all my
projects in one
library. Why would I want more than one? Why would I want to
risk
overlooking a source that might be relevant for a new
project? After
more than 15 years, it's close to 17,000 entries, which
EndNote searches
almost instantly. If I think I want to associate a
particular reference
with one project, it's easy to use an entry in Keywords or
another field
for the purpose