On 4/12/07, Laurent GUERBY <laurent guerby.net> wrote:
>
> Unable to install: some application packages
required for the
> installation are missing.
>
> Given that's just some misconfigured/misdocumented
third party repo/deb,
> you can get those messages in any deb/apt based Linux
current
> distribution so that's quite unfair to the "app
manager" application.
It doesn't matter what the technical cause is, the
repository
situation is a mess. Debian and Ubuntu don't have this
problem by
better centralising, delegating and testing their packages
through a
single build system.
I worry that the Extras Repo is both too hard to upload to
*and* too
unregulated. For example, instead of porting a library like
libsoup
once, it's ported by Canola, it's ported for GPE etc. The
end-user
then suffers the problems caused by this lack of
co-ordination.
Yes, the original LWN article suggests it's the Application
Manager's
fault, but getting that corrected to point out the chaotic
situation
of an ever-expanding set of (potentially incompatible)
repositories is
a minor difference in an otherwise valid point.
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers maemo.org
h
ttps://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
|