>> With a quick test, it looks like you can just use
UTF8... At least,
>> Firefox trunk, GM 0.6.4
>
>Correct. The uXXXX tip certainly has the very neat
added advantage of
>not requiring additional explanations we are unable to
give about how
>to set up the unknown-to-us-editing-environment to
produce UTF8 rather
>than some other random encoding of choice. (Windows is
natively fond
>of UTF16, for instance.)
I guess the only problem that I have with this suggestion is
that I currently don't know how to lookup the unicode
(uXXXX) character equivalent any given glyph/ideogram/etc
(in case you hadn't already figured it out, I'm clueless
when it comes to the ins-and-outs of unicode).
_______________________________________________
Greasemonkey mailing list
Greasemonkey mozdev.org
http:
//mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/greasemonkey
|