libffi 2.99.4

Thanks for all the test results so far.  I dug up a sparc
solaris 10 
machine and got good results there as well.

Here's the latest tar file (last one for today!)...
ftp://sourceware.org/pub/libffi/libffi-2.99.4.tar.gz

Fedora SRPM here...
http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi-2.99.4-1.fc8.src.rpm


AG

darwin 32-bit (x86 and ppc) check out (after adding
darwin64.S for x86):

Test Run By twall on Thu Feb 14 19:14:45 2008
Native configuration is powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0

                 === libffi tests ===

Schedule of variations:
     unix

Running target unix
Using /opt/local/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board 

description file for target.
Using /opt/local/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic
interface  
file for target.
Using
/Users/twall/ws/libffi-2.99.4/testsuite/config/default.exp
as  
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running
/Users/twall/ws/libffi-2.99.4/testsuite/libffi.call/call.exp
...
Running
/Users/twall/ws/libffi-2.99.4/testsuite/libffi.special/ 
special.exp ...

                 === libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes            1389
# of unsupported tests          15

Test Run By twall on Thu Feb 14 19:17:29 2008
Native configuration is i386-apple-darwin9.2.0

                 === libffi tests ===

Schedule of variations:
     unix

Running target unix
Using /opt/local/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board 

description file for target.
Using /opt/local/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic
interface  
file for target.
Using
/Users/twall/ws/libffi-2.99.4/testsuite/config/default.exp
as  
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running
/Users/twall/ws/libffi-2.99.4/testsuite/libffi.call/call.exp
...
Running
/Users/twall/ws/libffi-2.99.4/testsuite/libffi.special/ 
special.exp ...

                 === libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes            1389
# of unsupported tests          15


Still trying to figure out how to run x86_64...

On Feb 14, 2008, at 6:14 PM, Anthony Green wrote:

> Thanks for all the test results so far.  I dug up a
sparc solaris 10  
> machine and got good results there as well.
>
> Here's the latest tar file (last one for today!)...
> ftp://sourceware.org/pub/libffi/libffi-2.99.4.tar.gz
>
> Fedora SRPM here...
> http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi-2.99.4-1.fc8.src.rpm

>
> AG
>

Timothy Wall wrote:
> darwin 32-bit (x86 and ppc) check out (after adding
darwin64.S for x86):
>
Thanks Tim.  I've fixed the darwin64.S problem.

ftp://sourceware.org/pub/libffi/libffi-2.99.6.tar.gz


AG

Anthony> Here's the latest tar file (last one for
today!)...
Anthony>
ftp://sourceware.org/pub/libffi/libffi-2.99.4.tar.gz

I'm not so sure about the ffi_prep_closure man page (I
didn't look in
this tar, just CVS, in case it matters).  In the .texi I
documented
that as deprecated in favor of ffi_prep_closure_loc -- which
is
required for platforms with non-executable heaps.

Maybe we could do like gcc and generate man pages from the
texi?


I forgot to mention -- the libffi texi could use
documentation on
platform ABIs.

Tom

Anthony Green schrieb:
> Thanks for all the test results so far.  I dug up a
sparc solaris 10 
> machine and got good results there as well.
> 
> Here's the latest tar file (last one for today!)...
> ftp://sourceware.org/pub/libffi/libffi-2.99.4.tar.gz
> 
> Fedora SRPM here...
> http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi-2.99.4-1.fc8.src.rpm

> 
> AG
> 

The docs are GPL'd, while the rest of the code has more
liberal licenses;
is this intended?

Thanks,
Thomas

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Heller
<thellerctypes.org> writes:

Thomas> The docs are GPL'd, while the rest of the code
has more
Thomas> liberal licenses; is this intended?

Oops, I wasn't really thinking about it.
I am happy with whatever documentation license Anthony
wants.

Tom