I expand on Matt's remark about the difficulty of even
obtaining
basic data.
It would be very useful if the publishers of journals with
occasional OA articles were to post lists of those
published.
Asssuming that they engage in such a manner of publication
in the
hope of providing at least some OA, they ought to want to
display
their success.
Dr. David Goodman
Associate Professor
Palmer School of Library and Information Science
Long Island University
dgoodman liu.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-liblicense-l lists.yale.edu on behalf of
matt biomedcentral.com
Sent: Wed 4/12/2006 8:12 PM
To: liblicense-l lists.yale.edu
Subject: Re: Dramatic growth of open access
...
A better approach would be to analyse the number of
immediate
open access articles published year on year. This is
challenging
to do, not least because several years on it is very
difficult to
be sure what *was* open access at the moment of publication.
But
that is really the metric that counts.
Matthew Cockerill, Ph.D.
Publisher
BioMed Central ( http://www.biomedcentra
l.com/ )
bond, UK
Email: matt biomedcentral.com
|