On Mar 13, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> This gets Chandler to be interoperable with other
calendar clients,  
> but only if Cosmo is used.  It doesn't get Chandler to
be  
> interoperable with Hula, Oracle server or other CalDAV
servers, or  
> is that still going to work as it does today?

Yes, I was imagining that when talking to servers other than
Cosmo,  
Chandler would do what it does today: it would speak CalDAV
to CalDAV  
servers, and publish XML and monolithic .ics files to WebDAV
servers.


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev"
mailing list
h
ttp://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev