Cindy,
>From now on, we will be treating this as a formal
objection due to the
current phase of this specification.

Would it be possible for you to issue a proposal for your
issue today
before the call scheduled for 16:00 Eastern?  
If it would be convenient for you, I would like to invite
you to attend
that call so that you may discuss your proposal with the
group directly.

We hope to progress the specification by early July, so we
hope that
this can be dealt with expeditiously.
I will separately send an email to Mr. Wolff inviting him to
today's
call as well.
Thank you
-bob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-comments-requestw3.org
[mailto:public-ws-
> addressing-comments-requestw3.org] On Behalf Of Cindy
McNally
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 4:46 PM
> To: plhw3.org
> Cc: public-ws-addressing-commentsw3.org
> Subject: RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services
Addressing 1.0 -
> Metadata)
> 
> 
> Philippe,
> 
> I believe that this is a substantive issue that should
be
reconsidered.
> I
> will post a follow-up citing technical arguments and a
proposed
change.
> Please note that two related issues were never formally
addressed by
> the
> group:
> 
> http:/
/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> addressing/2007Jan/0027.html
> 
> http:/
/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> addressing/2007Mar/0036.html
> 
> Also, from a procedural standpoint, should my follow-up
be worded as a
> 'formal objection' or would that occur after
reconsideration by the
> workgroup, i.e. assuming the issue is closed again with
no action?
> 
> 
> >From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plhw3.org>
> >To: cindymcnally_6hotmail.com
> >CC: public-ws-addressing-commentsw3.org
> >Subject: RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services
Addressing 1.0 -
> Metadata)
> >Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:09:55 +0000
> >
> >Cindy,
> >
> >the Web Services Addressing Working Group would
like to move Web
> >Services Addressing 1.0 - Metadata to Candidate
Recommendation. Since
> >the Group decided, after due considerations, to
close your issue with
> no
> >action [1], we'd like to hear from you and know if
you're ok with us
> >moving forward or if you would like the Group to
reconsider it. We'd
> >appreciate if you can tell us your position asap.
Failing to hear
from
> >you by June 21, we would request the Director to
move forward,
> >
> >Thank you,
> >
> >Philippe
> >
> >[1]
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressin
g-
> comments/2007Jun/0000.html
> >
> >
> 
>
____________________________________________________________
_____
> Who's that on the Red Carpet? Play & win glamorous
prizes.
>
http://club.live.com/red_carpet_reveal.as
px?icid=REDCARPET_hotmailtextl
> ink3