Hi Bob,

Unfortunately, I cannot attend the call, but hopefully the
attached response 
will be sufficient.  Thanks.

>From: "Bob Freund" <bobfreunds.com>
>To: "Cindy McNally" <cindymcnally_6hotmail.com>,	<plhw3.org>
>CC: <public-ws-addressing-commentsw3.org>
>Subject: RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services
Addressing 1.0 - Metadata)
>Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:24:05 -0400
>
>Cindy,
>From now on, we will be treating this as a formal
objection due to the
>current phase of this specification.
>
>Would it be possible for you to issue a proposal for
your issue today
>before the call scheduled for 16:00 Eastern?
>If it would be convenient for you, I would like to
invite you to attend
>that call so that you may discuss your proposal with the
group directly.
>
>We hope to progress the specification by early July, so
we hope that
>this can be dealt with expeditiously.
>I will separately send an email to Mr. Wolff inviting
him to today's
>call as well.
>Thank you
>-bob
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-addressing-comments-requestw3.org
[mailto:public-ws-
> > addressing-comments-requestw3.org] On Behalf Of Cindy
McNally
> > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 4:46 PM
> > To: plhw3.org
> > Cc: public-ws-addressing-commentsw3.org
> > Subject: RE: Action Property Issue (Web Services
Addressing 1.0 -
> > Metadata)
> >
> >
> > Philippe,
> >
> > I believe that this is a substantive issue that
should be
>reconsidered.
> > I
> > will post a follow-up citing technical arguments
and a proposed
>change.
> > Please note that two related issues were never
formally addressed by
> > the
> > group:
> >
> > http:/
/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> > addressing/2007Jan/0027.html
> >
> > http:/
/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-
> > addressing/2007Mar/0036.html
> >
> > Also, from a procedural standpoint, should my
follow-up be worded as a
> > 'formal objection' or would that occur after
reconsideration by the
> > workgroup, i.e. assuming the issue is closed again
with no action?
> >
> >
> > >From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plhw3.org>
> > >To: cindymcnally_6hotmail.com
> > >CC: public-ws-addressing-commentsw3.org
> > >Subject: RE: Action Property Issue (Web
Services Addressing 1.0 -
> > Metadata)
> > >Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:09:55 +0000
> > >
> > >Cindy,
> > >
> > >the Web Services Addressing Working Group
would like to move Web
> > >Services Addressing 1.0 - Metadata to
Candidate Recommendation. Since
> > >the Group decided, after due considerations,
to close your issue with
> > no
> > >action [1], we'd like to hear from you and
know if you're ok with us
> > >moving forward or if you would like the Group
to reconsider it. We'd
> > >appreciate if you can tell us your position
asap. Failing to hear
>from
> > >you by June 21, we would request the Director
to move forward,
> > >
> > >Thank you,
> > >
> > >Philippe
> > >
> > >[1]
> > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressin
g-
> > comments/2007Jun/0000.html
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
____________________________________________________________
_____
> > Who's that on the Red Carpet? Play & win
glamorous prizes.
> >
>http://club.live.com/red_carpet_reveal.as
px?icid=REDCARPET_hotmailtextl
> > ink3
>

____________________________________________________________
_____
Don’t miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes
from Microsoft 
Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/