Email lists > Python developers > Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 365 (was Re: PEP: per user site-packages directory) > Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 365 (was Re: PEP: per user site-packages directory)

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 365 (was Re: PEP: per user site-packages directory)




This post if a part of  this thread

2008-01-21 17:25:09
Re: PEP 365 (was Re: PEP: per user site-packages directory)
On Jan 21, 2008 1:46 PM, "Martin v. Löwis"
<martinv.loewis.de> wrote:
> > What I meant was that we could include an
easy_install.py whose sole
> > function is to ensure that setuptools is installed
and then invoke
> > the "real" easy_install.  Thus, the
first time you ran easy_install,
> > a current version would be downloaded, and
thereafter the real one
> > would be runnable.
>
> Despite my (well-known) objections to setuptools as the
foundation for
> the .egg format (and everything that comes with it), I
think that would
> be a desirable and easy thing to do. Including a
setuptools bootstrapper
> into the distribution still leaves the choice of
actually using
> setuptools to the end user.

What Martin said, almost verbatim. =)

-Brett
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Devpython.org
ht
tp://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/p
ython-dev/nessto%40sharedlog.com

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )