Email lists > NUT development > Re: [NUT-devel] [nut]: r648 - docs/nut.txt > Re: [NUT-devel] [nut]: r648 - docs/nut.txt

Re: [NUT-devel] [nut]: r648 - docs/nut.txt




This post if a part of  this thread

2008-03-03 11:42:03
Re: : r648 - docs/nut.txt
Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 06:16:52PM +0100, Michael
Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:48:23PM +0100, Diego
Biurrun wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:50:21PM +0100,
michael wrote:
>> > >
>> > > --- docs/nut.txt	(original)
>> > > +++ docs/nut.txt	Mon Mar  3 14:50:19 2008
>> > >  -1017,6 +1017,39  The muxer SHOULD repeat
non-mandatory he
>> > >
>> > > +Furthermore to start correct
"presentation" (after seeking) it is neccessary
>> > > +to have a decoded frame from every
stream at approximately the same time.
>> > > +Thus it is important to have closely
placed keyframes in all streams at least
>> > > +once every N seconds. This is equivalent
of having back pointers frequently
>> > > +short.
>> >
>> > I cannot parse the last sentence.
>>
>> Is the s/of/to/ you commited enough or do you think
this need further
>> clarification?
>
> It needs further clarification.  "frequently
short" is not something I
> can make much sense of.

If I understood the intent correctly, "having frequent,
short back pointers"
is the correct phrasing.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mansmansr.com
_______________________________________________
NUT-devel mailing list
NUT-develmplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/nut-devel

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )