Email lists > > Re: [fitswcs] Polarization codes > Re: [fitswcs] Polarization codes

Re: [fitswcs] Polarization codes




This post if a part of  this thread

2008-03-27 23:46:57
Re: Polarization codes
On Fri 2008-03-28T14:39:09 +1100, Mark Calabretta hath
writ:
> On Thu 2008/03/27 14:09:40 -0000, Paddy Leahy wrote
> in a message to: Mark Calabretta <mcalabreatnf.csiro.au>
> and copied to: fitswcsnrao.edu

Did anyone else get that message from Paddy Leahy?
I've checked my junk filters and I didn't see it, and it's
not
in the fitswcs archive.  But turning to Mark's reply

> in practical
> terms you have de facto title to a bit of the FITS
namespace, in this
> case BTYPEia, BUNITia, BSCALia and BZEROia.  In any
case, these keywords
> do not conflict with any other documented FITS usage so
noone can stop
> you from using them; this is the concept of private
extensibility
> extolled by Don Wells.

I have to say that I find all of these Bxxxxxxx keywords to
be
completely in accord with FITS from its inception.  We may
be annoyed
by the 8-character keywords, but examples like this show
that we are
not limited by them.  I look forward to the refinement of
these
and the creation of some conventional values that get into
standards.

--
Steve Allen                 <slaucolick.org>            
   WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory        Natural Sciences II, Room 165   
Lat  +36.99855
University of California    Voice: +1 831 459 3046          
Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064        http://www.ucolick.org/~
sla/     Hgt +250 m

_______________________________________________
fitswcs mailing list
fitswcslistmgr.cv.nrao.edu
h
ttp://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/fitswcs

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )