Dear Fabio, thank you for your comment/clarification about
the term "REST".

Fabio Forno schrieb:
> While it's true that in SOAP+XMPP specs there is no
asynchronous
> message exchange pattern (and that was a mistake,
though I think it's
> possible to add a new MEP), this is not related to
REST. Neither the
> concept of session id is somewhat related to REST, at
the contrary,
> REST explicitly forbids things like session ids. The
basic principles
> of REST in fact are:
>   
Sorry for causing confusion with this term. In conclusion we
- as egon 
already mentioned we will use another term and fix the
sentences where 
"RESTful" term was used.

Johannes