List Info

Thread: Re: Pylucene 2.1.0-2, Python 2.5, Win32




Re: Pylucene 2.1.0-2, Python 2.5, Win32
user name
2007-05-30 22:12:18
Hi Andi,

Okay, I successfully compiled with your mingw 3.4.6.  Same 2
failed tests, so 
no probs.

I have made the archive available here:

http://dev.krys.ca/downloads/PyLucen
e/PyLucene-2.1.0-2-gcj346-py25-win32.zip

(Notice the gcj version) 

As before, feel free to link to it.

I also need to make x86, x86_64 and FreeBSD 5.4/5.5
compiles. :(  Believe it 
or not, I need them all for personal and professional use.
O_o  I will make 
them available too as I get them working.

One question:  Can I use 3.4.6 on x86_64?  Or do I have to
mess with 4.x?  My 
initial attempts with 4.x gets me failed tests.

Hope this all helps.  Thanks for the help.

Krys

On Tuesday 29 May 2007 21:49, Andi Vajda wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007, Krys Wilken wrote:
> > I just blindly did what the INSTALL file said.  So
I got my gcj (and gcc,
> > etc) from:
> >
> > http://prdownloads.sf.net/mingw/gcc-java-3.4.2-2
0040916-1.tar.gz
> >
> > I am happy to try your 3.4.6 build as soon as I
get a chance.
>
> Sure, no need to but if you do it, it's better since
the gcj is newer.
> I remember that 3.4.2 is the earliest rev that anyone
should use. Newer
> 3.4.x are better. Newer 4.x are iffy. Older 3.4.x have
problems.
>
> > Maybe an update to INSTALL is in order.  I have
already noticed
> > references to 3.4.6 in the Makefile, so it's kind
of like getting
> > conflicting information. Just a thought.
>
> Yes, that'd be good. This whole compiler business is
rather hairy,
> inconsistent across platforms and a pain to maintain.
>
> > As for a 4.x.  I have not probs trying it, but I
am certainly not
> > qualified to debug it and make it sane, as you
say. My Java and C and
> > compiling in general are very rusty.  They were
all killed by a Python.
> > ;D  (Well, no... actually they were killed by my
agreeing to take a job
> > maintaining other people's brain dead VB code. 
I've probably gotten
> > stupider because of it.) :(
>
> No worries. Compiling gcj for Windows is really for the
masochist. No point
> in trying it unless you have a special interest in
doing it. I'd love for
> someone to volunteer as my pain threshhold is kind of
low in the
> building-gcj area these days. GCJ on Windows isn't
exactly actively
> maintained either.
>
> Building gcj on Windows requires tracking down the
correct build
> information, the correct people with that info, having
a Linux box to
> cross-compile it on, having the time to watch gcj
build, over and over as
> you make simple stupid mistakes in the many steps
required to cross-compile
> it, and then finally debug it with no debugger.
>
> > Anyway, since the gcj version info is important, I
will add it to the
> > file name and README_FISRT.txt file I added.  I'll
let you know when it's
> > done. You might want to hold off on the link until
it's done.
>
> Great, let me know when you're ready.
>
> Andi..
> _______________________________________________
> pylucene-dev mailing list
> pylucene-devosafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylu
cene-dev
_______________________________________________
pylucene-dev mailing list
pylucene-devosafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylu
cene-dev

Re: Pylucene 2.1.0-2, Python 2.5, Win32
user name
2007-05-31 01:34:52
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Krys Wilken wrote:

> Okay, I successfully compiled with your mingw 3.4.6. 
Same 2 failed tests, so
> no probs.
>
> I have made the archive available here:
>
> http://dev.krys.ca/downloads/PyLucen
e/PyLucene-2.1.0-2-gcj346-py25-win32.zip

Great, I should be adding a link shortly.

> I also need to make x86, x86_64 and FreeBSD 5.4/5.5
compiles. :(  Believe it
> or not, I need them all for personal and professional
use. O_o  I will make
> them available too as I get them working.

What's x86, x86_64, I assume you mean Linux on these chips
?

> One question:  Can I use 3.4.6 on x86_64?  Or do I have
to mess with 4.x?  My
> initial attempts with 4.x gets me failed tests.

I doubt it. I've built a sane PyLucene on x86_64 (Ubuntu 64)
with a gcj 4.2.0 
snapshot, though. For details, see: 
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pi
permail/pylucene-dev/2006-November/001404.html
Binaries are available for this platform from the PyLucene
homepage.

Note that you *must* - for some unknown reason - start from
the .java 
sources, you cannot use the source tarballs containing
pre-compiled Lucene 
.jar files when using gcj 4.x.

Thanks !

Andi..
_______________________________________________
pylucene-dev mailing list
pylucene-devosafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylu
cene-dev

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )