List Info

Thread: Boost 1_33 VS Boost 1_31// matrix_sparse.hpp




Boost 1_33 VS Boost 1_31// matrix_sparse.hpp
user name
2007-04-16 08:25:00
Hello to everyone,

I just need a hint :

I worked with a library based on boost 1_31 matrix sparse & shared_ptr on a 32b station ( suse 9.3);
then i shifted to 64b and Ubuntu  ( 6.10 Ubuntu, that is supporting boost 1_33) .

I´m trying to compile my old codes, but i got only one, fondamental problem:

my matrix cannot be loaded up , her original size was a ( 225 * 244)  with boost 1_31
and with the new boost what I get back is something like a Super-Shrinked Matrix
( 1 *45) .
In this way a lot of data are discarded and I really don´t know what I should do...

Has anyone an idea? Even criticism will be accepted!

Thank you in advance,

Susy


Re: Boost 1_33 VS Boost 1_31// matrix_sparse.hpp
country flaguser name
Germany
2007-04-16 09:21:29
On Monday 16 April 2007 15:25, Susy wrote:

> my matrix cannot be loaded up , her original size was a
( 225 * 244)  with
> boost 1_31
> and with the new boost what I get back is something
like a Super-Shrinked
> Matrix
> ( 1 *45) .
> In this way a lot of data are discarded and I really
don´t know what I
> should do...

Can you give a some more details? There should be no
difference in the public 
interface and behavior. Can you post a short code sample?

mfg
Gunter

_______________________________________________
ublas mailing list
ublaslists.boost.org
htt
p://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas

Re: Boost 1_33 VS Boost 1_31// matrix_sparse.hpp
user name
2007-04-16 09:35:02
Thank you a lot, Gunter and sorry to not have been enough precise...

however luckily I´ve found an old file that I got with the old distro and
the old machine..
From the beginning:
file mat.m is obtained with boost 1_31
file mat2.m is obtained with boost 1_33

mat.m is including even the column of mat2.m somewhere
I´ve included a file wiht the method that can load up the
boost matrix,

Thank you in advance for any hint,

Susy





On 4/16/07, Gunter Winkler < guwi17gmx.de">guwi17gmx.de>; wrote:
On Monday 16 April 2007 15:25, Susy wrote:

&gt; my matrix cannot be loaded up , her original size was a ( 225 * 244)  with
> boost 1_31
> and with the new boost what I get back is something like a Super-Shrinked
> Matrix
>; ( 1 *45) .
> In this way a lot of data are discarded and I really don´t know what I
> should do...

Can you give a some more details? There should be no difference in the public
interface and behavior. Can you post a short code sample?

mfg
Gunter

_______________________________________________
ublas mailing list
ublaslists.boost.org">ublaslists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas



  
  
  
[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )