Hi Peter,
No offense no and I'm glad you pointed out things we've done
along the
way that should benefit every Pythonista out there
(PyLucene, PyICU,
Localization Eggs) not to mention clear support for
wxPython.
That being said, I'd like to hear why you don't find it
useful (could be
any number of things really). If you could send a short
writing to me
outside the list (so not to bore anyone as it is clearly off
topic),
I'll really appreciate.
Cheers,
- Philippe
Peter Damoc wrote:
> I hope I'm not offending anyone but to me Chandler is
more like
> "Encyclopedia Galactica", not really useful
BUT the process of
> creating it maintained the knowledge and induced
progress in
> technology.... and that... that is something everyone
on this list
> benefited from.
>
> Peter
>
> On 9/22/07, *Robin Dunn* <robin alldunn.com
> <mailto:robinalldunn.com>> wrote:
>
> Paul McNett wrote:
> > Wow, Chandler is going 1.0?
> >
>
> It's the 0.7 release currently.
>
>
> --
> Robin Dunn
> Software Craftsman
> http://wxPython.org Java
give you jitters? Relax with wxPython!
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> wxPython-dev-unsubscribelists.wxwidgets.org
> <mailto:wxPython-dev-unsubscribelists.wxwidgets.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> wxPython-dev-helplists.wxwidgets.org
> <mailto:wxPython-dev-helplists.wxwidgets.org>
>
>
>
>
> --
> There is NO FATE, we are the creators.
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: wxPython-dev-unsubscribelists.wxwidgets.org
For additional commands, e-mail: wxPython-dev-helplists.wxwidgets.org
|
